Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Cox v. Aversa et al
as 1:2018cv03898
Plaintiff:
James J. Cox
Defendant:
Samantha Aversa and Andrew D. Piliero-Kinderman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinderman v. General Dynamics Corporation
as 3:2017cv01772
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Kinderman
Defendant:
General Dynamics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Staples v. Deyo et al
as 9:2017cv00703
Plaintiff:
Rahson Staples
Defendant:
D. Deyo, Joe Patane, Mark D. Kinderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kinderman et al
as 9:2017cv00425
Plaintiff:
William D. Thomas
Defendant:
Kinderman, Bud Ballinger, Janochowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Polizzi et al
as 9:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
William D. Thomas
Defendant:
Polizzi, Louis Pingotti, Jamie M. LaManna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pingotti et al
as 9:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
William A. Thomas
Defendant:
L. Pingotti, G. Gardner, J. Taylor-Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester v. Thomas, et al
as 9:2016cv01350
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hester
Defendant:
J. Thomas, Officer Tuttle, S. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. VanBuren
as 16-3444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vincent Barrow
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Lawrence Farago, Psychiatrist
Defendant:
Bryan Hilton, Superintendent of Programs, Michael Hoagan, Deputy Commissioner, Office of Mental Health, Department of Corrections, Anthony Devitto, Executive Director of Special Programing and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. LOOP et al
as 4:2016cv00126
Defendant:
BADGER, BANIT, DANA BISHON and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE BONNER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
