Cases 21 - 30 of 95
SMITH v. ATF SUPERVISOR JOHN/JANE DOE et al
as 2:2022cv03877
Plaintiff:
MALIK SMITH
Defendant:
ATF SUPERVISOR JOHN/JANE DOE, KYLE M. RAGUZ, JOHN SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frith v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
Rodney Vance Frith
Defendant:
Harold Walter Clarke, Kyle and Dr. Kyle Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chester County Prison
as 1:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Kyle Smith
Defendant:
Chester County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralph White v. Kyle Smith
as 22-6143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH D. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE SMITH, NURSE D. DAMERON, NURSE A. PHYL and others
Riggleman v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Terry A. Riggleman
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Mark Amonette and Kyle Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv04036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61528
Plaintiff:
KYLE SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40096
Plaintiff:
KYLE SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allyson Drozd v. Jeffrey McDaniel, et al
as 21-35584
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLYSON DROZD
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY MCDANIEL, individually
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, LARRY GRAHAM, individually, COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH and others
Skogman Realty Co. v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Tailwind Group, Inc., Tailwind College Street IC, LLC and Kyle Smith
Plaintiff:
Skogman Realty Co. doing business as Skogman Commercial Realty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
