Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Floyd
as 1:2016cv02226
Petitioner:
Kirk L. Floyd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Floyd v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv02189
Petitioner:
Kirk L. Floyd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Adkins et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv04020
Plaintiff:
Terry Ennis Adkins, Issac Aguilar, Sevim Aybulut and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Adkins et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
Terry Ennis Adkins , Issac Aguilar , Sevim Aybulut and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC , KBR, Inc. , Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Dennis Floyd
as 14-15303
Petitioner:
In re: DENNIS L. FLOYD
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
USA v. Woodrow Dixon, Jr.
as 14-13405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WOODROW RUDOLPH DIXON, JR. and KIRK L. FLOYD, a.k.a. Kirk Lorin Floyd
Wainwright v. Blanchard City of et al
as 5:2014cv00518
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Wainwright
Defendant:
Blanchard City of and Robert L Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Floyd et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv02072
Plaintiff:
Willie L Floyd and Doris M. Floyd
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. , Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Floyd v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 5:2013cv06752
Plaintiff:
Amy S. Floyd and Robert L. Floyd
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
