Cases 21 - 30 of 2,139
Jefferson v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Jefferson
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon T. Hininger, David M. Garfinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon T. Hininger, David M. Garfinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lappin, M.D. v. Scott and White Clinic
as 6:2021cv00543
Defendant:
Scott and White Clinic
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Lappin, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 9
Chavez et al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv01720
Defendant:
Tyler Fokas (#19036), The City of Chicago, Daanish Waudiwala (#19418) and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Delgado and Leslie Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bralen Jordan v. Kathleen Sawyer, et al
as 20-2954
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE EBBERTS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Director of Operations/Custody, KATHLEEN H. SAWYER, Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Hill v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv02830
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. True, Harley Lappin and others
Petitioner:
David Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moon v. Schreiber et al
as 3:2020cv00880
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Harley G Lappin, Andre Matevousian and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Scott v. Northam et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Pocahontas Correctional Center, Ralph Northam, USP Marion, IL. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
