Cases 21 - 30 of 35,857
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisa O. Lewis v. Martin O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02965
Plaintiff:
Lisa O. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
MCKENZIE v. LEWIS
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
VERNON LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis-Bey v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Carlos Devon Lewis-Bey
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS v. HIRSCH et al
as 5:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
North Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans
Respondent:
Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon, Stacy Eggers IV and others
Intervenor:
Philip E. Berger and Timothy K. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starnes v. Ward et al
as 6:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
Tracy Wright Starnes
Defendant:
Paul Ward, Seth Mills, Greenville County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Andrea Ratfield, et al v. United States Drug Testing Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 24-1858
Plaintiff:
ANDREA RATFIELD, ANN MARIE KELLY, BRIAN RAY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DRUG TESTING LABORATORIES, INC., DOUGLAS LEWIS and JOSEPH JONES
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv11288
Plaintiff:
Kierstin Lewis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
