Cases 21 - 30 of 267
Woods v. Crow, et al
as 22-3205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KISHEN WOODS, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SAM CROW, KOREY A. KAUL, (FNU) LOLLY and others
Woods (ID 77647) v. Crow et al
as 5:2022cv03191
Plaintiff:
Kishen Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Sam Crow, Korey A. Kaul, (fnu) Lolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Hueing et al
as 3:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Keith Brewer
Defendant:
Unknown Hueing and Unknown Lollis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lollis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv02301
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Lollis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Duran et al v. City of Porterville et al
as 1:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
John Duran and Eric John Duran
Defendant:
City of Porterville, John Lollis and Porterville City Council
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PC) Lollis v. Zell et al
as 2:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
William Lollis and William Matthew Lollis
Defendant:
Zell, Brian Kibler, Connie Gippson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maness v. Davis et al
as 8:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Maness
Defendant:
Matthew G Davis, Kenneth D Lollis, Chad McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Lollis v. Zell et al
as 2:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
William Lollis and William Matthew Lollis
Defendant:
Zell, Jenkins, Brian Kibler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
