Cases 21 - 30 of 30
BRICKER v. BRITTON et al
as 3:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, MARY JO BARBER, SARGENT NEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2009cv05135
Plaintiff:
Mary A. Barber, Mary A. Barber and Mary A. Barber
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bricker v. Ruffo et al
as 1:2009cv01394
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers, Michael W. Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bricker v. Harlow et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Michael W. Harlow, Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abramczyk et al v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2008cv04330
Plaintiff:
Greg J. Abramczyk, Clarence H. Ackerman, Charles Allison and others
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jack Allen v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-3328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CERVELLO, SCI Houtzdale (Physician's Assistant) sued in their individual and official capacity, HOOVER, SCI Houtzdale (Physician's Assistant) sued in their individual and official capacity and NAJI, SCI Houtzdale (Physician's Assistant) sued in their individual and official capacity
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections, sued in his individual and official capacity, GEORGE PATRICK, Superintendent of SCI Houtzdale, sued in his individual and official capacity, JANET PEARSO, SCI Houtzdale Nurse Supervisor, sued in her individual and official capacity and others
ALLEN v. BEARD et al
as 3:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant:
JEFFERY A. BEARD, GEORGE PATRICK, JANET PEARSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HAVRILAK v. BARBER
as 3:2007cv00339
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HAVRILAK
Defendant:
MARY JO BARBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: MDL - 1698 American General Life & Accident Insurance Co. Retiree Benefits ERISA litigation
as 3:2005md01698
Defendant:
American General Life & Accident Insurance Company, American General Life & Accident Insurance Company and American General Life & Accident Insurance Company
Consol Plaintiff:
Eleanor M. Acres, Eleanor M. Acres, Eleanor M. Acres and others
Consol Third Party Plaintiff:
American General Life and Accident Insurance Co., American General Life and Accident Insurance Company, American General Life and Accident Insurance Company and others
Consol Third Party Defendant:
John H. Askew, Jr., John H. Askew, Jr., John H. Askew, Jr. and others
Consol Defendant:
Oliver H. Bunton, Jr. and Aldora J. Thompson
Consol Counter Claimant:
American General Life and Accident Insurance Company
Consol Counter Defendant:
Raymond L. Addison and Raymond L. Addison
Mediator:
Terrence M. White
Counter Claimant:
American General Life & Accident Insurance Company and American General Life & Accident Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
W.L. Boyd, W.L. Boyd, W.L. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Harden Manufacturing Corporation v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2004cv10981
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Linda B. Shearer, Donna Sims, Joshua M. Martinez and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Melissa Hamill, Parke-Davis and others
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Judith G. Dein, Carol Janney and Darren Mancuso
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Dainippon Pharmaceuticals USA Corporation, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Members of the Class Plaintiffs Steering Committee, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Benjamin Jonathan Crone and others
Intervenor:
Rhonda Gayle Goodridge, Mark Dudley, Susan Dudley and others
In Re:
Neurontin Marketing Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Interested Party:
Travelers Indemnity Company
Intervenor Plaintiff:
American Home Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
