Cases 21 - 30 of 11,244
Rudd v. Mays et al
as 2:2024cv02400
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Latanua K. Rudd
Defendant:
Mays H. Samuel, JR., State of Tennessee and Tennessee Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Love et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Bradford Love and May-Ling Love
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv02872
Plaintiff:
Althea May Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biagini v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 3:2024cv03364
Plaintiff:
MAY JOY S. BIAGINI
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Caplan v. PPG Architectural Finishes Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv22137
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
PPG Architectural Finishes Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as PPG PAINTS and May Property Acquisitions LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Obamedo v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04560
Plaintiff:
Marlo Latrice Obamedo
Defendant:
Dart and Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chrustowski v. Equal Employment Services, et al
as 1:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
Equal Employment Services, Emily Davis, Mai Hoang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
