Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 142
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff: Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant: City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Daniels v. Ward
as 2:2022cv00260
Plaintiff: Jennifer L Daniels
Defendant: Michael Lee Ward
Not Classified By Court: Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD v. M.B. FINANCIAL BANK
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A. WARD
Defendant: M.B. FINANCIAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARD v. CHAFIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00111
Plaintiff: MICHAEL CHARLES WARD
Defendant: JAMES V CHAFIN, JON FORWOOD, KENNETH W MAULDIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Ward v. George Stephenson
as 21-2964
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL CHARLES WARD
Respondent / Appellee: GEORGE STEPHENSON, Warden
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48607
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DAVID WARD
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Ward v. George Stephenson
as 21-2784
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL CHARLES WARD
Respondent / Appellee: GEORGE STEPHENSON, Warden
Michael Ward v. George Stephenson
as 21-2743
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL CHARLES WARD
Respondent / Appellee: GEORGE STEPHENSON, Warden
MOORE, SR. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02880
Respondent: BOROUGH HALL POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD H. BRADBURY, JR., CRAIG A. JOHNSON and others
Petitioner: JEREMIAH MOORE, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. ORTIZ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv06122
Petitioner: MICHAEL A. WARD
Respondent: DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?