Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Lee v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01110
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Lee
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Doe v. Heritage Academy, Inc., et al
as 17-16703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
HERITAGE ACADEMY, INC., HERITAGE ACADEMY LAVEEN, INC., HERITAGE ACADEMY QUEEN CREEK, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lee v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv02968
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Lee
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee et al v. Walmart Store #795 et al
as 1:2017cv00507
Plaintiff:
Marie E Lee and Jesse Lee
Defendant:
Walmart Store #795 , Walmart Stores East LP and Elaine Dyches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10046
Plaintiff:
Mary Lois Lee
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vicky Avila et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02320
Plaintiff:
Vicky Avila , Sandra Lee Hambeck , Ethel Hankins and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Shelby County, Alabama v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-5138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shelby County, Alabama
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., In his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Earl Cunningham, Harry Jones, Albert Jones and others
Vicky Avila et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as CAC/2:14-cv-01829
Plaintiff:
Vicky Avila , Sandra Lee Hambeck , Ethel Hankins and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and McKesson Corporation
Vicky Avila et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01829
Plaintiff:
Sue Ashley, Vicky Avila, Diana Berry and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
