Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Joseph Cotropia v. Mary Chapman, et al
as 16-20766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH COTROPIA
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY CHAPMAN, Only in her Individual Capacity, TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD and others
Cotropia v Mary Chapman, et al
as 4:2016cv00742
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cotropia
Defendant:
Mary Chapman, Texas Medical Board, Members of the Texas Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Spaugh v. Chapman
as 4:2015cv00906
Plaintiff:
Betty Spaugh
Defendant:
Mary Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina
as 3:2015cv00710
Plaintiff:
Anne Marie Chapman
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abney et al v. Axiall Corp
as 2:2015cv00300
Plaintiff:
Christopher Abney , Delores Alaniz , Delores Alanix and others
Defendant:
Axiall Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Land St Martin Parish et al
as 6:2014cv03135
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Land St Martin Parish, J C B Development Inc, Margaret A Shinn Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Chapman v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv05221
Plaintiff:
Trisha Ann Marie Chapman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mary Chapman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv04211
Plaintiff:
Mary Chapman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Mary Chapman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08166
Plaintiff:
Mary Chapman
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc. and others
Chapman v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie Chapman
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
