Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 873
Allen et al v. Campbell
as 3:2024ms00002
Plaintiff: Michael Allen, Camp Bench Holdings, LLC, Camp RiverHolding, LLC and others
Defendant: Neil Campbell
Allen v. Gulley
as 4:2023cv01634
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Allen
Defendant: Collet Gulley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Ivy v. Pope County Sheriff's Office
as 23-3672
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael Allen Ivy
Defendant / Appellee: Pope County Sheriff's Office
Underwood v. Bodiford
as 1:2023cv05479
Petitioner: Travon De'Aundre Underwood
Respondent: Michael Allen Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00492
Petitioner: Michael Allen James
Respondent: United States of America
Interested Party: Joseph G. Bertogli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Allen v. Madden
as 23-4094
Petitioner: MICHAEL ALLEN
Respondent: RAYMOND MADDEN
Czajkowski (PS) v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv02942
Plaintiff: Conrad J Czajkowski
Defendant: Michael Allen, Kimberly Karn and Rebecca Briggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Sims et al
as 4:2023cv01631
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Allen
Defendant: Phil Sims, Warden Addam Riddle and Bremer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullock v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv03041
Plaintiff: Michael Allen Bullock
Defendant: Jessica Doe, John Does I-XX, 119,873.29 U.S. DOLLAR COIN and others
Garnishee: BAM Trading Services, Inc., BAM Management US Holdings Inc, Payward Ventures, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stumpf v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00381
Plaintiff: Phillip Kevin Stumpf
Defendant: Darius Michael Allen, DA-Block and Intermodal West, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?