Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 211
EMRIT v. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS et al
as 2:2023cv02119
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ADAMS & GARTH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Adams & Garth, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EMRIT v. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS et al
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ADAMS & GARTH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00403
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Adams & Garth, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00921
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Wrongful Termination of Employment
Assurance Wireless USA, L.P., et al v. Alice Reynolds, et al
as 23-15490
Plaintiff / Appellant: ASSURANCE WIRELESS USA, L.P., METROPCS CALIFORNIA, LLC, SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALICE B. REYNOLDS, President of the California Public Utilities Commission, in her official capacity, KAREN DOUGLAS, Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission, in her official capacity, DARCIE L. HOUCK, Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission, in her official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: MULTICULTURAL MEDIA, TELECOM AND INTERNET COUNCIL, ALLVANZA, CALIFORNIA HAWAII STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, and LATINO JUSTICE PRLDEF
Caroline County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Town of Federalsburg, Maryland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff: Caroline County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Caucus of African American Leaders, Roberta Butler and others
Defendant: Town of Federalsburg, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20035
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. State Board of Election Commissioners et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00734
Plaintiff: Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Dr. Andrea Wesley, Dr. Joseph Wesley and others
Defendant: State Board of Election Commissioners, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Intervenor Defendant: Mississippi Republican Executive Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michigan Welfare Rights Organization, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 22-7164
Plaintiff / Appellee: Michigan Welfare Rights Organization, Maureen Taylor, Nicole Hill and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donald J. Trump, in his personal capacity
Defendant / Appellee: Donald J. Trump For President, Inc. and Republican National Committee

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?