Cases 21 - 30 of 32
DeLarwell v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony DeLarwell
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Wisconsin Correctional Center System, Badger Health Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schuenke, Lloyd v. Wisconsin Department of Correction's et al
as 3:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lloyd T. Schuenke
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Correction's , Edward Wall , Deirdre Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31803
Plaintiff:
Nancy Bowen and William L. Bowen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWEN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65742
Plaintiff:
JAMES M BOWEN and NANCI BOWEN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hrenak v. Frank et al
as 1:2009cv01102
Plaintiff:
Kelly Anthony Hrenak
Defendant:
Matthew J Frank, Rick Raemisch, James Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWEN v. USA
as 2:2009cv01125
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
NANCY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BOWEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv01126
Petitioner:
NANCY BOWEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jarvis v. Bowens et al
as 2:2009cv00558
Plaintiff:
Ronald W Jarvis
Defendant:
Nancy Bowens, Ken Adler, Sara Kropp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Patrick Fitzgerald v. James Greer, et al
as 08-2627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK J. FITZGERALD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GREER, TIMOTHY CORRELL, DEBRA LEMIKE and others
BOWEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2007cv00746
Plaintiff:
NANCY BOWEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
