Cases 21 - 30 of 34
ANDERSON v. OFC J. SALERNO et al
as 2:2019cv19926
Defendant:
OFC WONG, RRM F.B.O.P. PATRICK MCFARLAND, LT. EICHENRACH and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B ANDERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azzara v. McFarland
as 19-1604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul Azzara
Defendant / Appellee:
Patrick McFarland, in his individual capacity, U.S. Bureau of Prisons
VAUGHN v. GEO GROUP et al
as 2:2018cv17527
Defendant:
MR. SPINETTA, JILL KILEY, MR. FORDYCE and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONT VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babar v. McFarland et al
as 1:2018cv01362
Respondent:
RRM Manager Patrick McFarland and Warden David J. Ebbert
Petitioner:
Syed A. Babar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VAUGHN v. GEO GROUP et al
as 2:2018cv10148
Plaintiff:
LAMONT VAUGHN
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, JILL KILEY, DURANT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Azzara v. McFarland et al
as 1:2017cv07309
Plaintiff:
Paul Azzara
Defendant:
Patrick McFarland and U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Azzara v. McFarland et al
as 1:2017cv06902
Plaintiff:
Paul Azzara
Defendant:
Patrick McFarland and U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanford v. Bruno et al
as 1:2017cv05132
Defendant:
Investigator D. Allen, Leslie Bruno, CDC Hearing Officer Daniel Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bloch et al v. Executive Office of the President et al
as 1:2015cv01146
Plaintiff:
Catherine A. Bloch and Scott J. Bloch
Defendant:
Executive Office of the President , Clay Johnson, Deborah Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McFarland et al v. Ethicon Women's Health and Urology et al
as 2:2013cv32628
Plaintiff:
Susan McFarland and Patrick McFarland
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology , Ethicon, Inc. , Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
