Cases 21 - 30 of 103
ROANE v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00377
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, JOHN F. CARAWAY, JOHN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ROANE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Correll v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv04168
Plaintiff:
Travis Emory Correll
Defendant:
The United States of America, Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. SAMUELS et al
as 2:2014cv00348
Defendant:
D. ALLRED, BOND HOLDERS/ISSUERS DOES 1-5, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
MARC PIERRE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Correll v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv04158
Petitioner:
Travis Emory Correll
Respondent:
The United States of America , Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bruce v. Osagie et al
as 1:2014cv02068
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
John T. Rathman, Alejo Borrero-Hernande, Lee H. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Laird
as 14-3134
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRANDON CHE LEE
Respondent - Appellee:
PAUL M. LAIRD
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, JOHN CARAWAY, JOHN AND JANE DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICALS and others
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lee v. Laird
as 5:2014cv03090
Petitioner:
Brandon Che Lee
Respondent:
Paul M. Laird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Darnell Moon v. Barron Pratte, et al
as 14-1873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darnell Wesley Moon
Defendant - Appellee:
Barron E. Pratte, President/CEO of CTC, Amy Walp, Case Manager, Karen Auners, Director and others
BOLDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 2:2014cv00103
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, WARDEN JOHN CARAWAY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BOLDEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
