Cases 21 - 30 of 1,592
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Minga v. Regions Bank, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Martha K. Minga
Defendant:
Regions Bank, Inc. doing business as Regions Bank doing business as Regions Mortgage and Corelogic Tax Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carter v. Regions Bank
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Alvin Stephon Demiro Carter
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Foundation Title & Escrow Company, LLC V. Regions Bank, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Foundation Title & Escrow Company, LLC
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Maureen Rosenblum v. Regions Bank et al
as 2:2024cv02009
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Maureen Rosenblum
Defendant:
Regions Bank and Regions Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Acevedo v. Regions Bank
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Acevedo
Defendant:
Regions Bank Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Daniels v. Regions Bank
as 4:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Troy L Daniels
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
