Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Westbrook v. Elliott et al
as 2:2010cv02670
Plaintiff:
Bob Westbrook
Defendant:
Terry Elliott and Rodney Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finley v. Clark et al
as 2:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Jaicourrie Finley
Defendant:
Brian Clark, Rodney Robinson, David Wolven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Robinson v. A C And S, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-82058
Defendant:
A C And S, Inc
Plaintiff:
Rodney Robinson
WATTS et al V. A.C.AND S.INC.,ET AL
as 2:2007cv66354
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE MARY WARDEN, STEVEN BARNES, JOSEPH LEE BARNES and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.P. INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Garry White v. Rodney Robinson, et al
as 09-10267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARRY W WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY ROBINSON, Sergeant, MITZI COLEMAN, Commanding Officer, HAROL BERTRAND, Commanding Officer and others
Robinson v. Lancaster County Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2008cv03149
Plaintiff:
Rodney Robinson
Defendant:
Lancaster County Department of Corrections and Michael Kinney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Robinson et al
as 4:2008cv02178
Plaintiff:
Garry Wayne White
Defendant:
Rodney Robinson, Jeremy Cagle, Mitz Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Medical Staff et al
as 4:2008cv02202
Plaintiff:
Garry Wayne White
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Mitz Coleman, Harcl Bertrand and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROBINSON v. WARDEN GRONOLSKY et al
as 1:2008cv02340
Plaintiff:
RODNEY ROBINSON
Defendant:
WARDEN GRONOLSKY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mize et al v. Crawford et al
as 2:2008cv04063
Plaintiff:
Eric Mize, Shaheed Muslin Habeebullah and Rodney Robinson
Defendant:
Larry Crawford, Steve Long, Mike Kemna and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
