Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Smith v. Butler County et al
as 5:2018cv03289
Defendant:
Natasha Ward, Butler County, Dennis Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04308
Plaintiff:
Roger Smith
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00584
Plaintiff:
Roger Smith
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Janssen Ortho, LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kroemer v. Tantillo
as 18-1006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kent A. Kroemer
Defendant - Appellee:
R. Michael Tantillo, Roger Smith and Mark T. Fischer
JESSIE-BEY v. GEO et al
as 1:2017cv04578
Respondent:
JACK ADAMS, JAMES ANDREWS, JERRY BALENTINE and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY JOEL JESSIE-BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Squicciarini v. The Village of Amityville et al
as 2:2017cv06768
Defendant:
Third Assist. Chief Gavin Budde, Fire Chief Jeffrey Erath, First Assist. Chie Leland Greey and others
Plaintiff:
James Squicciarini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Canori Izquierdo v. Rennert et al
as 4:2017cv02636
Plaintiff:
Roger Smith Canori Izquierdo
Defendant:
Ira L. Rennert , The Renco Group, Inc. , D.R. Acquisition Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kroemer v. Tantillo
as 17-3436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kent A. Kroemer
Defendant - Appellee:
R. Michael Tantillo, Roger Smith and Mark T. Fischer
Roger Smith v. Florida Commission on Offender
as 17-14555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
CAPITAL CITY BANK v. SMITH et al
as 4:2017cv00350
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL CITY BANK
Defendant:
ROBERT V SMITH and JOHN ROGER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
