Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 93
USA v. Iyman Faris
as 20-1521
Defendant / Appellant: IYMAN FARIS, previously known as Mohammad Rauf
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles Hunter v. Director Rauf
as 19-7719
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES C. HUNTER
Defendant / Appellee: DIRECTOR RAUF, SUPERVISOR MALIKE and SUPERVISOR OSAFO
Defendant: NURSE OSAFO and NURSE MALIKE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01293
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Farooq v. Friendly Limousine Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05472
Defendant: Glenn T. Muller, Paul Muller, Jr., Friendly Limousine Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Imran Farooq
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rauf MuhammadIn re: Rauf Muhammad
as 19-5799
Petitioner: In re: RAUF MUHAMMAD
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Muhammad v. Kincaid et al
as 1:2019cv00562
Defendant: Lieutenant Colonel Mark Sites, Lieutenant Colonel Kevin Andarayese, 1st Lt. Hovannhyan and others
Plaintiff: Carlos A-Lail Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teymurzada et al v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2017cv08147
Plaintiff: Rauf Teymurzada and Oksana Permitina
Defendant: Elaine Duke , L. Francis Cissna , Thomas Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
US v. Rauf Salam We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-7305
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAUF ABDUL SALAM, a/k/a Pierre Demaro Banks, a/k/a Radio
BAKALI v. JONES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01162
Arbitrator: arbtre
Plaintiff: ABDUR RAUF BAKALI
Defendant: GLENN A. JONES , EAGLE EXPRESS LINES, INC and ABC CORPS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Muhammad v. USA
as 3:2017cv00368
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Rauf Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?