Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Hecking v. NH Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 14-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIRCK HECKING
Defendant - Appellee:
NH CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES, KELLY AYOTTE, KATHERINE J. BARGER and others
Filing Error
as 1:2013cv02325
Plaintiff:
Starr LaForce and Frank Bacety
Defendant:
Nathan J Pangrace, Robert E Blackham and Richard S Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hecking v. New Hampshire Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 1:2013cv00338
Defendant:
Kelly Ayotte, Katherine Barger, Tim Beaupre and others
Plaintiff:
Dirck Hecking
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HECKING v. NEW HAMPSHIRE CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Defendant:
ATTY. MS. "PAT", MS. KELLY AYOTTE, MS. KATHRYN BARGER and others
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MITCHELL v. POTTER
as 1:2013cv00333
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMMON and ALBERTA POTTER
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Mitchell v. Daniel Hampton
as 13-1075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL HENRY HAMPTON and R. STEVEN HEARN
Mitchell v. Hampton et al
as 3:2012cv00600
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Mitchell
Defendant:
Daniel Hampton and R Steven Hearn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Dennis et al
as 3:2012cv02255
Plaintiff:
Clinton D. Dudley
Defendant:
Jim Dennis, Gene Zmuda, Linda Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Annette McKee, et al v. Richard Mitchell
as 11-18043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNETTE MCKEE
Plaintiff:
BERTHA KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD C. MITCHELL, County Attorney, Oswego, New York
Mitchell et al v. McCalla Raymer LLC
as 1:2011cv04115
Plaintiff:
Richard V. Mitchell and Deborah Mitchell
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
