Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Hosea v. Alford et al
as 9:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Hosea
Defendant:
Richard Alford, Gary Hunter, Michael Muniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Hobbs
as 5:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Richard Alford
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martone et al v. Livingston et al
as 4:2013cv03369
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Martone and The Estate of Michael Martone
Defendant:
Brad Livingston , Richard Alford, James Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martone et al v. Livingston et al
as 3:2013cv00283
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Martone and The Estate of Michael Martone
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, James Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robertson v. Pittman et al
as 1:2013cv00417
Petitioner:
Robert Robertson
Respondent:
Micheal Pittman, Eric Briscoe, Richard Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Thaler et al
as 9:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
Marsellers Jordan
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Richard Alford, Jr. and T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Alford et al
as 1:2013cv00241
Plaintiff:
James D Murphy
Defendant:
Richard Alford, Diana Thornton, David Pille and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanspree v. Thaler et al
as 9:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Frank Sanspree
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Warden Richard Alford and Virgil E Miller, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Alford et al
as 1:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Romaine Harrison
Defendant:
Richard Alford, Brain E Nunnelly, Alonzo W Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennith Thomas v. Richard Alford, et al
as 12-41285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNITH WAYNE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
INA BROUSSARD, Mailroom Supervisor, DAVID G. PILLE, Law Librarian Secretary and RICHARD ALFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
