Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 14-1430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 14-1428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 14-1429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellant:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
v. Greenberg et al
as 2:2013at00760
Defendant:
Robert Greenberg, Robert Kerr and City of Vallejo
Plaintiff:
Montae Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2013cv01439
Defendant:
Robert Greenberg , Robert Kerr and City of Vallejo
Plaintiff:
Montae Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KERR v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2013cv02955
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KERR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams et al v. Stimson Lumber Company et al
as 2:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
John Adams , Kim Allan , Daniel Bennett and others
Defendant:
Stimson Lumber Company , Andrew Miller , Jane Doe Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Regets v. Plymouth, City of et al
as 2:2010cv12292
Defendant:
Plymouth, City of, Wayne Carroll, Cox Al and others
Plaintiff:
Neileigh Regets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 10-1191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
SANDRA RAY
Abraham et al v. Total Realty Management, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00006
Plaintiff:
Steven Abraham, Joseph Alexander, Debra Alexander and others
Defendant:
Total Realty Management, LLC, Mark Dain, Mark Jalajel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
