Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Rhodes et al v. West Virginia Division of Protective Services et al
as 2:2018cv01179
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Protective Services, Gregory Scott Fernatt, Travas Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rhodes and Robert Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RHODES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv13178
Petitioner:
ROBERT RHODES
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GEORGE O. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2015cv16208
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , John Frame , David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv09045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roe v. Chappaqua Central School District et al
as 7:2016cv07099
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Defendant:
Chappaqua Central School District , Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District , John Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Ballard et al
as 2:2015cv16550
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Taylor
Defendant:
David Ballard , Rose , Iotov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Close et al
as 2:2014cv24624
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis
Defendant:
Justin Close , Jason Bragg , Brandon Leazure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winter v. Plumley et al
as 2:2014cv26977
Plaintiff:
Jacob Benjamin Winter
Defendant:
Mark Plumley, Clifton Carr, Margaret Cliffard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Barbagallo et al
as 2:2014cv07529
Plaintiff:
Cedeal Harper
Defendant:
Joseph Barbagallo, Shawn Ramsey, Robert Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monge v. Doehling et al
as 2:2014cv00684
Plaintiff:
Manuel A Monge
Defendant:
Lori Doehling , Charlie Huibregtse, Robert Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
