Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Dietz v. Cypress Semiconductor
as 16-1209
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TIMOTHY C. DIETZ
Defendant - Appellant:
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
Interested Party:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, ASSOCIATE REGIONAL SOLICITOR, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR and others
Chapman et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv21602
Plaintiff:
Clyde K Chapman and Marna S Chapman
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Honda Motor Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Burnett v. Beard et al
as 2:2016cv00661
Plaintiff:
Ester Burnett
Defendant:
J. Beard, F. Foulk, S. Peery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Clyde K Chapman and Marna S Chapman
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Chapman et al v. Abernathy
as 1:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S Chapman , Terrance Anderson , Ellis Ball and others
Defendant:
Talmage L Abernathy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chapman et al v. Takata Corporation, et al
as 1:2015cv22133
Plaintiff:
Clyde K Chapman and Marna S Chapman
Defendant:
Honda R & D Co., Ltd., American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda of America Mfg., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adler v. McDonald et al
as 1:2015cv00554
Plaintiff:
Brent Adler
Defendant:
M. D. McDonald, R.L. Gower, D. Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adler v. McDonald et al
as 2:2015cv00789
Plaintiff:
Brent Adler
Defendant:
M. D. McDonald, R.L. Gower, D. Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01622
Plaintiff:
Ruth S. Chapman and James B. Chapman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Talco Security Incorporated
as 7:2014cv01956
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S Chapman
Defendant:
Talco Security Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
