Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Martin et al v. Schroeder
as 2:2016cv01285
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Martin and Robyn Lynn Martin
Defendant:
Christopher Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mawuyrayrassuna Noviho v. Lancaster County, et al
as 16-3047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAWUYRAYRASSUNA EMMANUEL NOVIHO
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCASTER COUNTY, SCOTT F. MARTIN, TODD E. BROWN and others
United States of America v. Martin et al
as 4:2016cv03052
Defendant:
Michelle L. Martin and Scott L. Martin
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Replevin & Conversion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv05053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NOVIHO v. LANCASTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2015cv03151
Plaintiff:
MAWUYRAYRASSUNA EMMANUEL NOVIHO
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA , SCOTT F. MARTIN , TODD E. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31294
Plaintiff:
Angela Martin and Scott E. Martin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lotocki et al v. American LaFrance, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00897
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lotocki , Peter J. Lotocki , Dennis C. Maciejewski and others
Defendant:
American LaFrance, LLC, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp., Seagrave Fire Apparatus, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott Martin v. Carolyn Colvin
as 14-35769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT DEAN MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Martin v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05787
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean Martin
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Martin et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as NYE/1:13-cv-02829
Plaintiff:
Scott D. Martin and Diana Martin
Defendant:
Merck & Co. , Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
