Cases 21 - 30 of 56,347
Kirgizbaeva v. Riddle et al
as 1:2024cv04142
Plaintiff:
Asel Kirgizbaeva
Defendant:
Director Kevin Riddle, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
John Koehler v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-9000
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH KOEHLER
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Rise for Animals v. Tom Vilsack
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
RISE FOR ANIMALS and ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant:
THOMAS JAMES VILSACK, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture and ELIZABETH GOLDENTYER, Deputy Administrator of Animal Care
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Young v. McDonough
as 24-1833
Claimant:
JAMES K. YOUNG
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
