Cases 21 - 30 of 393
RENDON et al v. BABBAR et al
as 3:2023cv22428
Plaintiff:
FELIPE D RENDON and VANESSA MEDRANO-CORTEZ
Defendant:
SANDEEP BABBAR, J&J TRANSPORT, ABC COMPANY 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
M&T Equipment Finance Corporation v. Bullet Express Line Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
M&T EQUIPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
BULLET EXPRESS LINE INC, SANDEEP KAUR and Bullet Express Line Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Saini v. Mahmood et al
as 2:2023cv01157
Plaintiff:
Sandeep Saini
Defendant:
Hamid Mahmood and AOH Real Estate LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CAI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
XIULING CAI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Bhat
as 5:2023cv03466
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandeep K Bhat
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
