Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Dinwiddie v. Sephora USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Jordan Dinwiddie
Defendant:
Sephora USA, Inc. and Cisco Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
SMITH v. SEPHORA USA INC. et al
as 3:2023cv01976
Plaintiff:
ALYSIA SMITH
Defendant:
SEPHORA USA INC, DIETRA GAINES, CAITLYN NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Aponte v. Sephora USA, Inc.
as 7:2023cv02887
Plaintiff:
Maria Aponte
Defendant:
Sephora USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. Kendo Holdings Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08958
Plaintiff:
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Kendo Holdings Inc., Marc Jacobs International, LLC, Sephora USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Sephora USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06812
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC
Defendant:
Sephora USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Gravel Rating Systems LLC v. Sephora USA, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Gravel Rating Systems LLC
Defendant:
Sephora USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Finster v. Sephora USA Inc.
as 6:2022cv01187
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Finster
Defendant:
Sephora USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Martin v. Sephora USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
Ruth Martin
Defendant:
Sephora USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
