Cases 21 - 30 of 4,547
Comer v. Holliman et al
as 2:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Comer
Defendant:
Rhonda Holliman, Regan Rodke, BN #518 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. Patrick County Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Seth D. Palmer
Defendant:
Patrick County Sheriffs Office, Deputy Kenny, Deputy Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anane v. Garland
as 24-1403
Petitioner:
ISAAC SETH ANANE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Green PA v. Tannenbaum, et al
as 24-1375
Plaintiff:
SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA
Defendant:
RICHARD SETH TANNENBAUM, LEIGH HOLDINGS, LLC and SAMANTHA ORY
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Black v. Massey et al
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Johnathan R. Black
Defendant:
Caprice Massey, Patrick Garrett, Seth Honl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Seth Lewis and Ashley Lewis
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lehmann v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
John Calvin Seth Lehmann
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Nationstar Mortgage LLC dba Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Randles
as 24-2360
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SETH RANDLES
Seth Schmidt v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11160
Plaintiff:
SETH SCHMIDT
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S. INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
