Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Timoteo Plancarte v. USDC-SAC
as 14-71663
:
In re: TIMOTEO PLANCARTE
Petitioner:
TIMOTEO PLANCARTE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
D. JORGE, GRIGGS, JOHN KRPAN and others
Whittaker v. United States of America
as 0:2013cv62130
Plaintiff:
Shaddy Whittaker
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Shaddy Whittaker
as 13-13863
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHADDY WHITTAKER
Shaddy Whittaker v. USA
as 13-10568
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHADDY WHITTAKER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bowen v. Cate et al
as 2:2012cv01519
Plaintiff:
Burch Michael Bowen
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Phyllis Milliner, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godhart v. Sharr et al
as 2:2012cv01005
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Godhart
Defendant:
Steve Sharr, Timothy Shaddy, George Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Whittaker v. United States of America
as 0:2011cv62459
Petitioner:
Shaddy Whittaker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shaddy v. McElfish, et al
as 8:1995cv00324
Defendant:
Kristine Busher, Harold W. Clarke, John Dahm and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Shaddy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plancarte v. Jorge et al
as 2:2011cv01993
Plaintiff:
Timoteo Plancarte
Defendant:
D Jorge, Griggs, Krpan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Wickensimer, et al v. Keith Smith, et al
as 11-3680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN WICKENSIMER
Plaintiff:
KELI DUNNICAN, MITCHELL MOORE, ROBERT GAUGHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH SMITH, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution, JACKSON, Maintenance Person, Toledo Correctional Institution, LONG, Maintenance Person, Toledo Correctional Institution and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
