Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Weinacker v. Shaddy et al
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Charles Weinacker
Defendant:
Aaron Shaddy, Ryan Finstad, Jeffrey Bantam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SHADDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56460
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHADDY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Filkorn, et al
as 1:2021cv01499
Plaintiff:
Dwayne E. Wilson, Sr.
Defendant:
Diane Filkorn, Mr. Davis, Ms. Shaddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Shaddy Whittaker
as 21-12123
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: SHADDY WHITTAKER
Shaddy Whittaker v. Arnaldo Sanchez, et al
as 19-13486
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY R. JOHNSON, Medical Doctor, Leesburg Regional Medical Center, ARNALDO SANCHEZ, D.O., FCC Coleman, D. IVEY, Nurse, FCC Coleman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHADDY WHITTAKER
SHADDY v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv02868
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
HEATHER SHADDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Veritiv Operating Company v. Sigma Supply of North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03092
Defendant:
Sigma Supply of North America, Inc. and Jon Christopher Shaddy
Plaintiff:
Veritiv Operating Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Shaddy Whittaker v. Arnaldo Sanchez, et al
as 18-11349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHADDY WHITTAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNALDO SANCHEZ, EDGAR MORALES, D. IVEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
