Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Phillips v. Smithsonian Institution
as 2:2019cv11852
Plaintiff:
Artie Dale Phillips
Defendant:
Smithsonian Institution and Lake Group Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02103
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Tyrone Hurt v. Natl African American Museum
as 18-1399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY AND CULTURE and SMITHSONIAN
Peters et al v. West et al
as 4:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
Wayne Peters and Cathy Peters
Defendant:
Daniel Roy West, Smithsonian Institution, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
BECK v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2017cv02488
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALVIN BECK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION and DAVID SKORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beck v. United States Government et al
as 3:2017cv01174
Plaintiff:
John Alvin Beck
Defendant:
United States Government, Smithsonian Institution and David Skorton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Hurt v. National Museum of African
as 17-1716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY AND CULTURE and SMITHSONIAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
M. Gibbs-Squires v. William Cosby, Jr., et al
as 17-1770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M. EUGENE GIBBS-SQUIRES, Esq.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR., SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BOARD OF REGENTS, SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
