Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00702
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Davis v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv04323
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., JAMES MONSEES, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26557
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY DAVIS MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROEBUCK v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2019cv02816
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROEBUCK
Defendant:
OFFICER MYERS, OFFICER STANLEY DAVIS, JR. and OFFICER RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Lawrence
as 1:2019cv00694
Plaintiff:
Stanley Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv00699
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
STANLEY DAVIS and FERN DAVIS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROEBUCK v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2019cv00278
Defendant:
OFFICER CULLEN, OFFICER RUTH, OFFICER STANLEY DAVIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROEBUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Stanley Ford, III
as 18-50249
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STANLEY IRVIN FORD III, AKA Bald Head, AKA Baldy, AKA Stanley Davis, AKA Stanley Hambrick, AKA Stan
Davis v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2018cv00303
Defendant:
Thomas Clavin, County of Suffolk, New York State Unified Court System and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCOLLUM et al v. PETERKIN et al
as 1:2017cv00965
Plaintiff:
WADDELL MCCOLLUM and LENA MCCOLLUM
Defendant:
HUBERT PETERKIN, TIMOTHY RUGG, SAMUEL MORANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
