Cases 21 - 30 of 93
Patterson v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02068
Respondent:
David Shinn, Jeff Van Winkle and Stephen Morris
Petitioner:
Isiah Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00907
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
KM a minor 1690 2010
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
NM a minor 7319 2012
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ducey et al
as 2:2020cv02012
Plaintiff:
Joe Clarence Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lance Hetmer, Douglas A Ducey, Stephen Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2020cv00526
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MORRIS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Elem #086747 v. Ducey et al
as 4:2020cv00424
Respondent:
Unknown McCullan, Unknown Buchholz, Teresa Leonard and others
Petitioner:
Henry Elem, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaykh Muhammad Al Saud v. Pannan Days, et al
as 20-16757
Defendant / Appellee:
PANNAN DAYS, Deputy Warden at SMU II Eyman Florence, THOMAS, Unknown; Sergeant, UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as "NROD; Northern Regional Operation Director" at Arizona State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAYKH MUHAMMAD ABDUL BIN TALAL AL SAUD, AKA Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Shaykh Muhammad Al Saud v. Rodney Carr, et al
as 20-16666
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM HENRY, UNKNOWN PARTIES, CANO, Unknown; CO II, Guard SMU 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAYKH MUHAMMAD ABDUL BIN TALAL AL SAUD, AKA Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
