Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Herndon v. Byers et al
as 6:2022cv06125
Plaintiff:
John Elwain Herndon
Defendant:
Warden Jared Byers, Thomas Daniel, Lieutenant Rondoni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Thomas Daniels
as 22-13590
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS DANIELS
Steven Hayes v. Dr. Thomas Daniel, et al
as 22-3032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven C. Hayes
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Thomas Daniel, Dr. Nannette Vowell, Physician Assistant Sharonda Long and others
Daniels v. Notre Dame University
as 3:2022cv00698
Plaintiff:
Bryce Thomas Daniels
Defendant:
Notre Dame University and University of Notre Dame
ROJAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11482
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DANIEL ROJAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tyrone Ellis v. Sharonda Long, et al
as 22-2373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
Sharonda Long, Advanced Practice Nurse (APN), Nannette Vowell, Thomas Daniel and others
Defendant:
APN John and Jane Doe
Hoff v. Clear et al
as 7:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Hoff
Defendant:
Stephen Clear, Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Captain Josh Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Laipply et al v. Laipply et al
as 2:2022cv00984
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Laipply and Evangelina Star Laipply
Defendant:
Thomas Charles Laipply, Laurel Laipply, Heidi C. Raveling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Ellis v. Daniel
as 6:2022cv06062
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Thurston et al
as 6:2022cv06049
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pittman
Defendant:
John Thurston, Dexter Payne, Dr. Thomas Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
