Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Niemic v. MA Department of Corrections, et al
as 14-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH NIEMIC
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LUIS SPENCER, BRUCE GELB and others
Rasheed v. D'Antonio, et al
as 14-1220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHAD AKEEM RASHEED
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA D'ANTONIO, MARLENE DODGE, DYANA NICKL and others
Whitney v. Hicks et al
as 1:2013cv00598
Defendant:
Thomas Hicks , Brandon Dahl, Three Rivers, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Whitney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Niemic v. Mass. Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2013cv11402
Plaintiff:
Keith Niemic
Defendant:
Mass. Dept. of Correction, Luis Spencer, Bruce Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steven Reed v. Job Council of the Ozarks, et al
as 13-1177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven L. Reed
Defendant - Appellee:
Job Council of the Ozarks, Warren Davis Properties and Thomas Hicks, Springfield, MO Police Officer
Nichols v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv01369
Plaintiff:
Jeff Nichols
Defendant:
Matthew Davis and Thomas Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rasheed v. D'Antonio, et al
as 12-2327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHAD AKEEM RASHEED
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA D'ANTONIO, MARLENE DODGE, DYANA NICKI and others
Defendant:
D. J. HAGER
Steven Reed v. Job Council of the Ozarks, et al
as 12-2717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven L. Reed
Defendant - Appellee:
Job Council of the Ozarks, Warren Davis Properties and Thomas Hicks, Springfield, MO Police Officer
LeBlanc v. University of Massachusetts Correctional Health et al
as 1:2012cv11133
Plaintiff:
Shane LeBlanc
Defendant:
University of Massachusetts Correctional Health, Thomas Groblewski, MD, Thomas Hicks, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
