Cases 21 - 30 of 154
Talbert v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01284
Petitioner:
Jesse L. Talbert
Respondent:
Acting Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Park v. Scarantino
as 5:2023ct03137
Plaintiff:
Joseph Park
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carrington v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2023ct03182
Plaintiff:
Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Scarantino, Federal Medical Center and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01137
Petitioner:
Jason Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dwayne Davis v. Thomas Mackie, et al
as 23-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE DAVIS, named as Dwayne Davis El
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN THOMAS P. MACKIE, A. HASKEY, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR T. BASSETT and others
Vang v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Phong Vang
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rios v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02108
Petitioner:
Antonio Rios
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McAdory v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01166
Petitioner:
Carlos Lattrell McAdory
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holder v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Col Holden, Col Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hershiser v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jack Dennison Hershiser
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Elmore Correctional Facility, Bullock Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
