Cases 21 - 30 of 44
DeVault v. Amonett et al
as 1:2019cv01066
Defendant:
Jonathan E. Baliff, Biggs C. Porter, Ian A. Godden and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bristow Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marilyn DeVault
Higgins v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
William Higgins
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and Biomet Orthopedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Higgins v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as NYE/2:18-cv-00079
Plaintiff:
William Higgins
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. and Biomet Orthopedics, Inc.
Higgins v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00079
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics, Inc. and Biomet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Higgins v. Sullivan
as 1:2017cv12513
Plaintiff:
William Higgins
Defendant:
Christine Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frank Konarski, et al v. City of Tucson, et al
as 17-16751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK KONARSKI, husband, DBA FGPJ Apartments & Development, GABRIELA KONARSKI, wife, DBA FGPJ Apartments & Development, PATRICIA KONARSKI, a single woman, DBA FGPJ Apartments & Development and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON, a body politic, MICHAEL G. RANKIN, husband, CATALINA O. RANKIN and others
Mack v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv03302
Plaintiff:
Terrence Mack
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Rahm Emanuel, Richard M Daily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King Consultants, Inc. et al v. Time2Share, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
King Consultants, Inc. , Scott King and Sean Hornbeck
Defendant:
Time2Share, LLC, Jeffrey Kelso and William Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray v. McCormick et al
as 1:2016cv01719
Plaintiff:
Richard Erin Gray, Sr.
Defendant:
Jean Eileen McCormick, Bradley T. Bracey, W.H. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
MCDANIEL v. SCI ALBION
as 1:2014cv00238
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MCDANIEL
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, WILLIAM HIGGINS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
