Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1662
Plaintiff: Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Akil Sachveda and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ibrahim Turkmen, Akhil Sachdeva, Anser Mehmood and others
Defendant - Appellee: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-999
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: James Sherman
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1003
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Salvatore LoPresti, MDC Captain
Turkmen v. Ashcroft We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-981
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Warden Dennis Hasty, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center(MDC), James Sherman, Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and others
I.B.E.W. Pacific Coast Pension Fund et al v. Nautical Engineering, Inc.
as 3:2012cv05441
Plaintiff: I.B.E.W. Pacific Coast Pension Fund , Warner Nelson , Dennis Callies and others
Defendant: Nautical Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Beck v. Muskingum County Ohio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00155
Plaintiff: Sean William Beck
Defendant: Muskingum County Ohio , Matt Lutz and Amy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUAREZ v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM (P.P.S.) et al
as 2:2011cv00507
Plaintiff: MICHAEL WILLIAM BECK SUAREZ
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM (P.P.S.), CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES (PHS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: 29 Ft. 2010 Yellowfin Center Console
as 8:2010cv02858
Petitioner: William R. Jacobsen
Respondent: Scott William Beck
Counter_claimant: Scott William Beck
Counter_defendant: William R. Jacobsen
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31301

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?