Cases 21 - 30 of 2,723
GovernmentGPT Incorporated et al v. Axon Enterprise Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv01869
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Axon Enterprise Incorporated formerly doing business as Taser International Incorporated and Safariland LLC
Plaintiff:
GovernmentGPT Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01512
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mantha v. QuoteWizard.com, LLC
as 24-8024
Respondent:
JOSEPH MANTHA, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Interested Party:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Petitioner:
QUOTEWIZARD.COM, LLC
Lemko Corp. v. Microsoft Corporation
as 24-2336
Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and AFFIRMED NETWORKS, INC.
Appellant:
LEMKO CORP.
Shankar v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Raghavendran Shankar
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wakefield v. Blackboard Inc.
as 24-2030
Defendant:
KALTURA, INC., BLACKBOARD INC., INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
COOLTVNETWORK.COM, INC. and FRANZ ANTONIO WAKEFIELD, dba CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv01347
Defendant:
Easi LLC, Actalent, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff:
Muazzez Mira
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv01350
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff:
Muazzez Mira and Actalent, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
