Cases 31 - 40 of 335
Eck v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers
as 4:2022cv03084
Plaintiff:
Cody Eck
Defendant:
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ECK et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 6:2022cv03098
Plaintiff:
MARK ECK and MARY ECK
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Estate of William Hennefer et al v. Yuba County et al
as 2:2022at00219
Plaintiff:
Estate of William Hennefer, J. A. H., J. U. H. and others
Defendant:
Yuba County, Wendell Anderson, Nicholas Morawcznski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of William Hennefer et al v. Yuba County et al
as 2:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
Estate of William Hennefer, J. A. H., J. U. H. and others
Defendant:
Yuba County, Wendell Anderson, Nicholas Morawcznski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. Harris et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ivory Ellison Hunter
Defendant:
J. Harris, Lt. Eckes and Sgt Haeusser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Eck et al v. Osage Land Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
P. John Eck and Osage Stack Partners III, LLC
Defendant:
Osage Land Company, Inc., Osage Stack Partners, LLC, Osage Stack Partners II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-96
Petitioner:
Mortimer-Side Initial Covered Sackler Persons
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-90
Petitioner:
Ad Hoc Committee of Governmental and Other Contingent Litigation Claimants
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-97
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. and Ad Hoc Group of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Respondent:
The State of Washington, The District of Columbia, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-116
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
