Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,269
Sullivan v. State of Montana, et al.
as 24-2682
Plaintiff: RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN
Defendant: STATE OF MONTANA, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, OFFICER WOLD and others
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff: BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant: STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Tanner v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11050
Plaintiff: Renee Elizabeth Tanner
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
232 West Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff: 232 W MASON LLC
Defendant: City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Larch v. Prosecuting Attorney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff: Tanner Moren Eagle Larch
Defendant: Prosecuting Attorney and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01852
Plaintiff: Jenny Tanner
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bowman v. Tanner
as 2:2024cv10993
Petitioner: Antoine E. Bowman
Respondent: Jeff Tanner
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff: Cordero Riley
Defendant: Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copeland v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00371
Plaintiff: Tanner Copeland
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bestway Oilfield, Inc. v. Trigger Energy, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01318
Plaintiff: Bestway Oilfield, Inc.
Defendant: Trigger Energy, LLC, Waylon Dean Geuke and Leroy Tanner Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?