Cases 31 - 40 of 512
Martin et al v. ACE American Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Louis Martin and Fachell Martin
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company, Justin Withers, MasTec Network Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Terry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Terry
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Shannon D. Withers, Troy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH v. WITHERS
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SMITH, III
Respondent:
WARDEN SHANNON D WITHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Withers v. Denise et al
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Denise, Judge Darigan, Judge Hrorshburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Levy et al v. McNamee et al
as 1:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
Elias Levy and Camerohn X. Withers
Defendant:
George C. McNamee, Gary K. Willis, Maureen O. Helmer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Plug Power, Inc.
Mullinix v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
Mary A. Mullinix
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Chief of Police William McManus, Peter Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Withers v. City of Aberdeen
as 3:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
Tom Withers, III
Defendant:
City of Aberdeen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Withers v. McConnell
as 23-1847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONYA WITHERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., Honorable
Withers v. McHugh
as 23-1846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONYA WITHERS
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN F. MCHUGH
Withers v. Darigan
as 23-1845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONYA WITHERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MELISSA E. DARIGAN, Rhode Island Superior Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
