Cases 31 - 40 of 7,352,466
Hilgart v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv08731
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hilgart
Defendant:
Commissoner Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Draeger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01034
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Julianne Draeger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 Supplemental Security Income Benefits (SSID)
Mack v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv12417
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe and City of Boston
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barros v. Rego et al
as 1:2024cv12418
Plaintiff:
Milton Barros
Defendant:
Anthony Grassini and Robert Rego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COMISKEY v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv09350
Defendant:
PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS INC.
Plaintiff:
JANICE COMISKEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Wiskup v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
Donald J Wiskup, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wasserman v. Beggs et al
as 2:2024cv03965
Defendant:
Robert John Beggs, COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, Attorney General David Yost and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Wasserman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
LUTEK JR v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv05040
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH LUTEK JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01331
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
