Cases 31 - 40 of 15,884
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv07083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Gary Boone v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6588
Plaintiff:
GARY DEAN BOONE, also known as Valerie Boone
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, A. MENDOZA, Warden FCI Williamsburg individually and in official capacity, S. HOEY, Medical Provider Williamsburg FCI individually and in official capacity and others
Sivak v. Friedland, et al.
as 24-3794
Petitioner:
LACEY SIVAK
Respondent:
MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND, CIRCUIT JUDGE, LAWRENCE VANDYKE, CIRCUIT JUDGE and SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Friedland, et al.
as 24-3791
Petitioner:
LACEY SIVAK
Respondent:
MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND, CIRCUIT JUDGE, LAWRENCE VANDYKE, CIRCUIT JUDGE and SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
