Cases 31 - 40 of 8,541
United States of America v. Clay
as 1:2024cv04217
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carleous Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Clay v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2024cv04194
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clay
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Valerie Flores v. City of Madison Wisconsin, et al
as 24-7076
Plaintiff:
Valerie Flores
Defendant:
City of Madison Wisconsin, Mayor, Wisconsin Board of Regents, Duane County, Wisconsin and others
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant:
Agilon Health, Inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Douglas et al v. Sell et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Dalton Douglas
Defendant:
Steven J. Sell, TIMOTHY S. BENSLEY, Glenn Sobotka and others
REED v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
CLAY REED
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Orr v. Richland County
as 4:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Berry v. Sinatra et al
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Berry
Defendant:
Cole Sinatra, Maria Cabrera, Sea Schiebelhut and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clay v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02325
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Clay
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Geathers v. McNeil et al
as 4:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Geathers
Defendant:
Larry McNeil and Clay Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
