Cases 31 - 40 of 2,472
Jose Guzman et al v. The Western Union Company et al
as 5:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jose Guzman, Fortino Rutilo Jimenez, Bertha Meza individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
The Western Union Company, Moneygram International, Inc., Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Meza-Moras
as 24-2436
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ELIDIO MEZA-MORAS
Wesco Insurance Company v. Pro Interiors, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Wesco Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pro Interiors, LLC, Wohlsen Construction Company, M. Brett Painting Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meza v. Fast Wireless LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Erick Meza
Defendant:
Fast Wireless LLC, Jorge Rosello, Unknown Rosello and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Meza
as 24-1784
Defendant:
MARIANO MEZA and Durango
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jenna Aurora Meza v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv01874
Plaintiff:
Jenna Meza and Jenna Aurora Meza
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Dow v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Andie Dow and Andre Dow
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Marks, Henley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
