Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant Featured Case
as 2:2017cv00706
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
"CBP&quot: Plaintiff v. Defendant
"DHS&quot: Plaintiff v. Defendant
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02470
Plaintiff: AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Valle del Sol, et al, v. Whiting, et al. Featured Case
as 2:2010cv01061
Plaintiff: C.M., Jose Angel Vargas, Coalicion De Derechos Humanos and others
Defendant: Michael B Whiting, Edward G Rheinheimer, David W Rozema and others
Intervenor Defendant: Arizona, State of, Janice K Brewer, Phoenix Law Enforcement Association and others
Petitioner: First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
Amicus Curiae: Legal Momentum, National Council of La Raza, American Immigration Lawyers Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2016cv00956
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff: AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Lawyers' Committee For Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00544
Plaintiff: Lawyers' Committee For Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area , Center for Gender & Refugee Studies , Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto and others
Defendant: Executive Office for Immigration Review and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
J. F.M., et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-35738
Plaintiff - Appellee: J. E. F.M., a minor, by and through his Next Friend, Bob Ekblad, J. F.M., a minor, by and through his Next Friend Bob Ekblad, D. G. F.M., a minor, by and through her Next Friend, Bob Ekblad and others
Defendant - Appellant: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, JUAN P. OSUNA, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, JEH JOHNSON, Secretary, Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FORMER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION JUDGES and others
American Immigration Lawyers v. Exec. Office for Immigration, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-5201
Plaintiff - Appellant: American Immigration Lawyers Association
Defendant - Appellee: Executive Office for Immigration Review, Juan P. Osuna, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00213
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252
Kolko et al v. Hale et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01094
Plaintiff: David Kolko , Luis Alberto Rojas Gomez and American Immigration Lawyers Association
Defendant: Dennis Hale , Jeh Johnson , L. Eric Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama et al v. Bentley et al Featured Case
as 5:2011cv02484
Defendant: Robert Bentley , Luther Strange , Joseph B. Morton and others
Plaintiff: Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama , Aids Action Coalition , Huntsville International Help Center and others
Movant: United States of America
Amicu: LULAC , META, Inc. , Hispanic College Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?