Cases 31 - 40 of 205
HARRIS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 mv Federal Tort Claims Act:Motor Vehicle
Harris #456411 v. Schroeder
as 2:2022cv00126
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris #456411
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03116
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Shanticia Hawkins, Byron T. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Antony Harris
as 22-10887
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONY JUNIOR HARRIS, a.k.a. Anthony Harris
HARRIS v. WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC.
as 2:2022cv14045
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dean v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
as 2:2022cv14044
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dean
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anthony Harris v. Kyle Ealey
as 22-1147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE EALEY, C/O Cook County Sherrif Deputy
Harris v. Kerr et al
as 2:2021cv01705
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Daniel Scott Kerr and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
HARRIS et al. v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al.
as 2:2021cv01822
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS, JOHN BRAMBLETT, PAULA SCHELLENBERGER and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Harris et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Daniel Harris, Lacie McCall and Michell Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
